Automotive
The Daytona: December 3, 2002
by Russ Knize on Dec.03, 2002, under Daytona
Well after some additional stripping of my Shadow ES, I’ve begun to take a close look at the issues with this car. The front end is really screwed up. I can see the buckled metal in the frame around the area of the front-right K-frame mount and the mount itself seems to be displaced. It’s pushing the front-right corner of the K-frame down by about an inch, giving it a weird twist. I can also see that the right wheel is offset to the rear by about 1/2 inch, compared to the left wheel. Assuming the K-frame wasn’t bent when it was installed in this crooked setup, I should be able to fix it by cutting the displaced mount off the car frame, fixturing the K-frame in the correct position and orientation, and welding it back on. I may also have to weld a plate over the area of the frame that is buckled to give it some additional strength. I will then recenter the engine, which should hopefully cure the front end shake problem.
I already have a lot of new parts for the car ready to go. I plan to replace the fuel pump and the fuel filler neck grommet (source of my leak) this evening, which should make the car more-or-less drivable. The pump is the Walbro/Holley 190 L/hr unit from FWD Performance, which flows 47% more fuel over the stock unit. The grommet was provided to me by the previous owner…he just never had a chance to install it. Still need to transfer the title, as my useless local DMV “doesn’t do that”. Next I’ll try to tackle the front-end issues, if I can get a hold of a MIG welder.
The CSX: December 2, 2002
by Russ Knize on Dec.02, 2002, under CSX
Well, the car is back together. It’s not perfect, but it’s close. I didn’t notice it before, but the right rear quarter is pushed in about 1/4″. Also, somehow the subchassis is tweaked such that the taillight is mounting a bit high and the bumper a bit low on the right side. It sort of spread things out. It looks fine until you get up close. Once these cars get bent, it’s really hard to get them back where they should be again. Everything else lined up well, though the liftgate is not popping open as it should. I suspect the latch is not operating as smoothly as it used to. Still need to paint that trim below the taillights, but it will just have to stay red until the spring.
Putting the bumper back together was a bit of a pain. All those stupid plastic studs broke off the bumper fascia when I got hit, so I ended up making bolts with very flat heads to mount them. The heads are covered by the CSX fascia, so that’s no biggie. I also threaded the CSX fascia studs so I could mount it to the bumper fascia with regular nuts. A lot of the original push nuts were gone anyway, so this setup worked well and allowed me to adjust the tension for minimal warpage.
The Daytona: November 23, 2002
by Russ Knize on Nov.23, 2002, under Daytona
Made it! The car is home. There really weren’t any problems making it back (that shake it has at low speed is still scary), though having to stop for gas 3 times was annoying. The fuel tank leaks if it’s above 3/4 full and the fuel pump is at risk of dying if the tank is less than 1/4 full. That leaves about 7 gallons of fuel to work with. Add to that the crumby mileage you get when you combine a 3-speed automatic transmission with a short drive ratio and a set of small 205/50R15 tires, and you find yourself stopping for gas quite often. The Dawes Devices A/F ratio meter also started working and I noticed the engine would stay rich for long periods of time while I was cruising (not in boost). That probably didn’t help either.
As I got closer to home, I started playing with the car a little more. I’ve owned a 2.2L Turbo I with an automatic before, but this one makes surprising power. Granted, the boost is bled to about 10psi, but that’s only 3psi over stock. I have some crazy plans to start playing with this early T1 setup, so we’ll see how much power I can make before I blow up the trans. 🙂
How I Got My Daytona C/S
by Russ Knize on Nov.23, 2002, under Daytona
After I decided to retire my faithful old Dodge Shadow ES, I started looking for a replacement daily driver. A little tired of P-bodies, I considered getting a Daytona. Lot’s of people drive Daytonas, so I wanted something a little different. I’m sort of partial to the hard lines of the earlier body styles, so I thought a pre-1987 Daytona would be an interesting choice. However, I kept my options open, as a solid body with good paint was my highest priority. While browsing the archives of various mailing lists, I came across this car for sale in Ohio for $800. The car had fairly recent paint and supposedly had a reasonably solid underbody (just needed a little floorpan work in the usual areas, I was told).
After talking to the seller for a while, I decided this would be a good buy. It had quite a few little problems, but it had good paint and it was a 1986 C/S, which is relatively rare. So I rented a car, drove down to Cincinnati and drove it back home. The car made it without incident, though it was a little scary at times.
Background Information
I guess I like owning cars with interesting histories. This one was found in a police impound by the previous owner. His intent was to use it as a parts car for his early T-top Daytona. As it turned out, the body on this Daytona was in much better shape than his other one (new paint, etc), so he decided to keep this one and sell the other.
While driving on a very bad road in Michigan, the previous owner hit a deep pothole that (as it turned out) bent the right-side control arm, the K-frame, and part of the underbody frame. The car started throwing left axles and developed a strange front-end shake at speeds below 35 MPH. His mechanic then discovered that the control arm was bent, so he had the entire K-frame replaced with a 1992 unit from a Shadow. The 1991 and up K-frames are superior to previous versions, as they have improved geometry and cast iron control arms for better stability. While this did stop the axle throwing problem, it did nothing for the front end shake. His mechanic then tried replacing the left motor/trans mount, as the original was apparently bent up. Unfortunately, it didn’t help and so he ended up selling it to me.
Prior to that, the car has had one other accident (according to CarFax). It apparently hit a curb back in January of 1991, which explains the strange welds all over the lower front cross member. There is also a piece of angle iron that is sort of sloppily welded to part of it. The CarFax report also showed that titles were issued for the car a total of six times in Ohio, all between 1997 and 1999. The mileage changed very little in that time. This may have had something to do with the car being impounded, as it may have changed hands as it was shipped around.
The CSX: November 21, 2002
by Russ Knize on Nov.21, 2002, under CSX
With my Shadow now donating the rest of the parts I need, I have finally made some progress on the repairs. Using my dad’s handy hydraulic kit, I was able to push the underbody most of the way back…still needs a few tweaks though. I test fitted the Shadow’s bumper, just to make sure the frame wasn’t tweaked at all. It fit perfectly. Looks like the restoration will have a happy ending.
The Shadow: November 21, 2002
by Russ Knize on Nov.21, 2002, under Shadow
R.I.P. I have decided to retire the old beast. The right rear brake line rusted through last week (not too uncommon). I spent several hours trying to patch it, but more and more of the lines crumbled away and all the fittings twisted off as I tried to remove them. If the body on this car wasn’t in such horrible shape (five shades of peeling red paint on a crooked body), I would certainly just fix it. This was simply the final straw for me…and excuse to get something worth fixing. I will be pulling the powertrain and stripping the body for spare CSX parts. After that I will part what’s left out and have it hauled away. It’s sad, as I have been driving this car for the past 7 years, but there comes a time when you just have to give it up. I learned a great deal about cars through the old-timer, and its memory will live on here.
The Shadow: October 24, 2002
by Russ Knize on Oct.24, 2002, under Shadow
After almost exactly 2 months of neglect (one of those spent waiting for parts), I finally got the trans rebuilt and installed. The rebuilt went well, once I broke down a bought the right tools. If you are going to work on one of these, buy yourself a pair of snap-ring pliers with flat, knurled ends and a decent, small gear puller. You’ll be glad you did. I bought both from Sears and they worked great. The puller made quick work of the front (bell housing side) intermediate shaft bearing as well as the outer race in the extension housing and the pliers made quick work of those annoying snap rings. The rest of the outer races came out with a hammer and punch.
The inner races are a bit more work, but aren’t bad as long as you are careful. Since there is nothing to grab with a puller, I opted to grind through the inner races most of the way with a Dremel, then hit it with a cold chisel and small sledge to crack it. The race will slide right off…just be careful of flying bits of metal and be sure to use those fiberglass-reinforced cutoff wheels. Also, if you opt to get the chome-moly bearing retainer plate, you MUST measure and adjust the input shaft preloading because it does not have the relief for the outer race of the rear input shaft bearing. The instructions in the service manual are fairly straight-forward. I opted for zero end play, since most of the input shafts on the transmissions I’ve worked on get sloppy shortly after a rebuild.
The new trans works great and it’s nice having my old beater back. Two months of paint peel has left the car looking as bad as ever, but it still goes like hell….
The CSX: October 12, 2002
by Russ Knize on Oct.12, 2002, under CSX
Thanks to our club’s prez, Jason Trotter, I now have a tail light and that flimsy trim piece. Now I just need a bumper support and struts. I’m thinking of getting brand new struts from Mopar, since all the ones I’ve seen in the yard (and on my cars) are rusted pretty bad.
The CSX: September 29, 2002
by Russ Knize on Sep.29, 2002, under CSX
BAM! Some kid in his daddy’s SUV rear-ended me today. A few seconds after stopping for a red light, he hit me thinking I had gone through (it had just changed). Just what I needed…another project. The damage isn’t too bad: collapsed bumper struts, bent bumper support, broken taillight, and the metal trim between the taillights and bumper is twisted up. There is no other frame or body damage except for the underbody behind the right tail light. That’s going to need a bit of pushing.
The CSX: September 2, 2002
by Russ Knize on Sep.02, 2002, under CSX
Kudos to Dave Tekampe for helping me install the new suspension components. The work wasn’t too bad except for the control arm bushings. Whatever stories you’ve heard about removing those suckers is true. It’s a chore getting the rubber out of the metal sleeve. All the metal pieces need to be saved because the kit from energy suspension does not contain anything useful except for the rubber itself. The rest of the bushings are fairly straight forward. After some trial and error, we found that pushing out the center sleeve with a large bolt, followed the rubber works best. There’s no need to push the outer sleeve out of the control arm. Of course, he had access to an arbor press….
Anyway, the CSX now has new Koni struts and shocks (including KYB strut mounts, etc), new Energy Suspension polyurethane control arm and sway bar bushings, and new lower ball joints. The car handles wonderfully now, compared to before, even with the eye-balled alignment and shot tires. Those are next on the list.
Disclaimer: The projects described in these web pages may use dangerous materials, and components. This material is intended for advanced electronics experimenters only and may cause your vehicle to be suitable for off-road use only. The author assumes no liability for damages incurred through the use or misuse of the information provided herein. This information is provided "as is" and without warranties as to performance of or any other warranties whether expressed or implied. No warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is offered.